Time Management
How to manage span of control using modern techniques?
Tracey Taylor
Suppose the key to a highly effective company is not in hiring more staff or slashing expenses but rather in one small feature—the number of individuals a manager supervises. The proper equilibrium is not only a number, but also a gamechanger. While some businesses flounder even with five staffers, others excel under a management system handling ten. What causes this? And how can you decide the ideal scope of supervision for your company? The solution might revolutionize the way your company runs: let us find out.
Suppose a sales team's average control span might be 10 salespeople per manager for instance. However, an ICT company selling sophisticated, custom products to big B2B clients might need every sales manager to oversee 68 business account managers. A company in the retail business operating several branches could need a branch manager to oversee 615 staff.
What is the Ideal Span of Control Ratio?
McKinsey's article suggests there is not one size fits all perfect control ratio. Instead, they propose a more sophisticated solution considering the complexity of the manager's tasks.
They figured five kinds of management (or supervisor)
- Player Archetype: These managers handle complex and unique tasks that demand extensive experience, such as strategic planning or consulting roles.
- Coach Style: Managers here juggle personal tasks by supporting their team via fixed procedures. Roles in marketing analytics administration sometimes exhibit this archetype.
- Supervisor Archetype: This arch type oversees consistent work with little personal autonomy. Instances could be senior finance VPs or accounting managers.
- Facilitator Archetype: Managers in this category handle highly standardized tasks with minimal individual contribution. Common positions could be managers of accounts receivable or accounts payable.
- Coordinator Archetype: This model is dedicated to controlling automatic and everyday activities, typical in positions like call center management.
Rather than a random number, this system helps identify the ideal span of management depending on the qualities and expertise needed for the manager's team.
4 Types of Spans of Control
- With hierarchical enterprises, a narrow span of control is when a manager has few underlings demanding close oversight and thorough direction suitable for sophisticated work.
- Wide Span of Control is when many subordinates depend on delegation and empowerment report to one manager; it works better for decentralized businesses and less complex tasks.
- Centralized Span of Control is common in businesses with only a few top-level executives, decision making and authority are centralized at the upper level, with upper-level managers overseeing fewer subordinates at once.
- Decentralized Span of Control, decision making and authority are not concentrated at the center but distributed across various levels, which lets managers at lower levels have a larger span, consequently allowing more autonomy and empowerment to rest with them inside the organization.
For what reason is the span of control significant?
Tracking and comprehending your business's span of control has several benefits.
- Raised efficiency: By optimizing the span of control of your company, team members can work more effectively. As a result, people who communicate more easily engage more and work more.
- Enhanced manager efficacy: Excessive number of team members can cause a manager's workload to grow, resulting in reduced output or even burnout. Efficiency will grow and satisfaction and performance will improve with an ideal span of control.
- Better choices taken: By improving the span and layers, individuals are given the power of acting. More effective decision making not only improves efficiency but also elevates employee morale by increasing engagement levels all over.
- Lower costs: Your staff works more efficiently and saves money with perfect spans and levels. That is since you will have more effective communication, fewer layers, and increased productivity throughout all teams.
- Better compensatory approach: Understanding your layers and spans allows you to identify fresh chances regarding pay grades and promotions, therefore building a more strategic compensation plan.
Common elements influencing control span
The extent of control is not a fixed quantity. So, no one ratio is best for every organization. It is influenced by several factors including:
- The type of labo: Based on Vizier research, some industries—sales or healthcare—perform better with a large team size and high span of control. Highly technical assignments might need more oversight as well; therefore, a tiny team would be preferable.
- Organizational volume: A big corporation may need several management tiers that would affect the span of control.
- Organizational framework: Compared to a hierarchical one, a flat system will allow for more control span.
- Employee knowledge: Experienced, highly specialized staff members will not need much direction. They also allow for more autonomy in the decision-making process and work, therefore permitting a wider range of control.
- Geographical spread: Managing remote teams spread across many different sites can be more complex and calls for more direct control.
- Manager competence and experience: As they will be able to juggle their work more simply and delegate as much as possible, a more experienced manager can manage a bigger team.
Still, you should not rely solely for the perfect span of control on this factor. Burnout can affect even the most seasoned manager. So also consider employee knowledge and the character of the job among other variables.
Understanding Time Efficiency in the Workplace
Time performance depends on organizational structure and manager efficiency. A well optimized span of management, that is, one that guarantees managers have the right number of direct reports, can affect workplace output. Having too many subordinates will increase a manager's
- Workload
- Cause Stress
- Mediocre Performance
- Ineffectual Delegation
A well-balanced span provides for better job satisfaction, good decision making, and clear communication. By evaluating and fine tuning their span of control, businesses can simplify operations, cut slippages, and in the end improve general time management throughout teams.
Effective time management is essential in getting the most out of your work time even if you do not work more. Optimizing efficiency means improving systems, removing distractions, as well as reducing waste; it does not just mean working longer. Stanford University research suggests that working more than 50 hours per week lowers output per hour, with a sharp fall at 55 hours, so overtime is ineffective. Furthermore, McKinsey and Company stress that efficiency might be improved up to 25% by using productivity tools.
Key Considerations for Analyzing Span of Control
It is important to determine if the “ideal” ratio is feasible for your organization. Here are things to consider when making this decision:
|
|
Span of control is too narrow
|
Span of control is too wide
|
|
Employee satisfaction
|
Workers could have the sensation they are being micromanaged and missing the independence they should have.
|
Employees might not get enough support and have a disconnect with their manager.
|
|
Communication
|
Several levels of management have to clear decisions, so communication could be sluggish.
|
Managers might find it challenging to keep abreast of every underling, thereby making unsound judgments.
|
|
Managerial workload
|
Poor use of the manager's time is micromanagement or over management of staff.
|
Managers who are overwhelmed cannot properly support every member.
|
Span of Control Management Challenges
Let us explore some common issues and potential solutions when it comes to achieving and maintaining the proper span of control:
|
Challenge
|
Details
|
Solutions
|
|
Communication Issues
|
With a larger span of control, effective communication becomes increasingly complex.
Managers may struggle to keep everyone informed. Plus, information overload can occur.
|
Establish clear communication channels and expectations for diverse types of information.
Employ collaboration tools, project management software, and regular team meetings to facilitate communication.
Encourage open communication and accessibility.
|
|
Managerial Burnout
|
Excessive direct reporting can cause managers who already have too much on their plates to suffer stress, exhaustion, and lowered job satisfaction.
|
Enable team members to handle extra tasks.
Let managers learn suitable time management approaches and prioritization capabilities.
Motivate leaders to balance their work and personal lives.
Give people access to support groups and mental health tools.
|
|
Inefficient Resource Allocation
|
Balancing the workload across team members can be challenging, leading to underutilization or overwork.
|
Regularly assess workload distribution among team members.
Develop employees with diverse skill sets to increase flexibility.
Consider options like remote work or flexible hours to accommodate varying workloads.
|
|
Maintaining Optimal Oversight
|
Having a greater range of control makes it harder to guarantee every team member is working at their best and meeting standards.
|
Define unambiguous performance criteria and monitor development.
Keep one on one meetings with staff members started regularly.
Encourage team members to own their work. With every pair of words, and vice versa, the number gives.
|
|
Employee Development
|
Supporting and developing a larger team can be a resource and time consuming.
|
Create definite career directions for staff members.
Give staff chances to expand and improve their skills.
Provide consistent evaluations and positive criticism.
|
Final Thoughts
StaffViz. The all-in-one staff management system developed to increase company efficiency for companies of all sizes solving the riddle of the perfect span of control just became simpler.
StaffViz uses data driven knowledge rather than guesswork to find the proper balance. Begin by evaluating the leadership styles and performance of your managers. Some are great at supervising bigger teams with more autonomy, others shine at hands-on work directing small groups of 3 to 5. StaffViz enables companies to see these qualities and organize staff members correspondingly.
Apart from managerial skills, the complexity of projects and the organization of the company also greatly affect results. Whereas hierarchical arrangements call for a more personal approach, flat companies sometimes gain from a broader span of control. StaffViz allows companies to smoothly change their span of control, therefore guaranteeing ideal team effectiveness, lower management workload, and increased general output.
Effectively Manage Remote and Hybrid Teams with StaffViz
Enhance team efficiency and collaboration with StaffViz, the ultimate tool for managing
remote and hybrid teams.
START FREE TRIAL 
I’m Tracey Taylor, a Content Strategist with over 4 years of experience in
B2B and SaaS marketing. I’ve worked with companies like StreamlineREI and StaffViz to drive
lead generation and business growth. Outside of work, I explore nature, read books, and play
games to stay physically and mentally sharp.
