Blog

We have all been there. You look at a project status report and realize, for the third week in a row, that one specific stream of work is lagging. Or perhaps you walk into the break room (or log onto Slack) and sense a distinct drop in energy. 

As a manager, your gut often speaks before the data does. You feel like the team is walking through the mud. High performers start looking exhausted as they silently pick up Slack, and morale begins to fray.

Identifying low performance is not just about catching someone “slacking off.” It is about protecting the culture you have built and ensuring that the people who are delivering do not burn out. Recognizing true underperformance has become more complex in today’s world of hybrid work, evolving role definitions, and the fine line between burnout and disengagement.

To spot low performers effectively, look beyond basic metrics and focus on meaningful behavioral patterns that reveal how someone contributes.

The Difference Between a Slump and a Slide

Before we start handing out Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs), we need to make a critical distinction.

Is the employee a chronic low performer, or are they just in a slump?

A slump is temporary. Personal issues, health scares, burnout, or a lack of clarity on a specific project often trigger it. A high performer in a slump usually knows they are struggling and feels bad about it.

A slide (chronic low performance) is a pattern. It is a sustained gap between expectations and delivery, often accompanied by a lack of accountability.

If you do not differentiate between the two, you risk alienating a great employee who just needs a break or enabling a poor employee who needs to move on.

The "Hard" Signs: Output and Quality

The most obvious indicators are found in the work itself. However, you need to look past the surface. A low performer might hit a deadline but destroy the team's efficiency in the process.

1. The "Good Enough" Standard

Some employees master the art of doing the bare minimum not to get fired. They treat quality benchmarks as ceilings rather than floors. If you find yourself constantly having to fix minor errors, reformat their slides, or double-check their code because you do not trust it, you are dealing with a quality gap.

2. The Feedback Loop of Doom

Mistakes happen. But when you point out an error, explain how to fix it, and then see the same error two weeks later, you have a problem. Low performers often lack the "stickiness" of learning. They nod during 1:1, but the behavior does not change. This indicates a lack of engagement or an inability to process feedback.

3. Reliance on the "Hero"

Watch the workflow. Does this employee constantly need help from your top performer to cross the finish line? Suppose Employee A cannot complete a task without asking "just a quick question" of Employee B every few hours. In that case, Employee A is effectively costing you two salaries for one output.

The "Soft" Signs: Behavior and Attitude

Often, the damage a low performer does is not miss deadlines—it's in the emotional toll they take on the team.

The Teflon Defense

Nothing sticks to them. When a deadline is missed, it is IT’s fault, or the client was unclear, or they did not get the email. If an employee has an external excuse for every internal failure, that is a massive red flag. High performers own their mistakes while low performers outsource the blame.

The Morale Vampire

Low performance can quickly spread negativity. Often, the person doing the least work is the loudest complainer. They might roll their eyes during meetings, shoot down new ideas without suggesting alternatives, or create divisions within the team. If the atmosphere noticeably lifts when someone is out of the room, pay attention.

Selective Silence

In meetings, do they contribute? I do not mean just talking—do they add value? A low performer will often stay silent during strategy sessions but will be very vocal about why a task cannot be done later. Or they might use "corporate speak" to fill airtime without committing deliverables.

The Modern Challenge

Recognizing Low Performance in Remote/Hybrid Teams

The shift to remote work has given low performers new places to hide. Without physical oversight, you cannot see who is taking two-hour lunches, but honestly, you should not care. You care about output. 

However, specific digital behaviors can signal disengagement:

• The Async Lag: In a remote setting, responsiveness matters. If an employee consistently takes 24 hours to reply to a simple Slack message or email, they are becoming a bottleneck.
• Camera-Off Culture: While not everyone wants to be on video all the time, an employee who never shows their face, even during 1:1s or team bonding, is signaling withdrawal.
• The "Busy" Calendar: Be wary of the employee whose calendar is blocked with "Focus Time" or vague "Syncs," yet produces very little tangible work. It is very easy to look busy digitally while doing absolutely nothing. 

Turn your gut feelings into clear insights with StaffViz

It gives managers real, objective data on team productivity, collaboration, and work output. No more guessing who is truly contributing, Staffviz shows task completion rates, communication speed, and balance in workload. Spot bottlenecks, catch early signs of disengagement, and make fair, fact-based decisions, all while respecting privacy. See how smart workforce data can change your management style with StaffViz.

The "Hidden" Low Performers

These are the hardest to spot because they defy the stereotype of the "lazy worker."

The "Nice Guy"

Everyone loves Dave. He remembers birthdays, organizes the fantasy football league, and is always smiling. But when you audit the quarter, Dave has not hit a single target. Managers often let this slide because they do not want to be the bad guy. But keeping "Nice Guy Dave" is unfair to "Hardworking Sarah" who is carrying his workload.

The Chaos Agent

This employee looks like they are working incredibly hard. They send emails at 9 PM. They are always "swamped." But when you look closely, they create chaos to solve it. They overcomplicate simple processes so they can look like heroes when they manage complexity. This is motion, not progress.

How to Verify Your Suspicions?

Before you call a meeting, you need to move from "gut feeling" to facts. Accusing someone of low performance without proof is a recipe for disaster (and potential legal trouble.

1. The "Bus Factor" Test

Ask yourself: If this person won the lottery and quit today, would the team’s productivity drop, stay the same, or improve? If the answer is "stay the same" or "improve," you have your answer.

2. Audit the Commits/Output

Go back three months. Look at the raw data. How many tickets did they close? How much revenue did they generate? Compare this strictly against their peers in similar roles. Data removes emotion from the equation.

3. The 360 Pulse Check

You do not need to ask, "Is Bob lazy?" Instead, ask the team: "Where are the bottlenecks in our current workflow?" or "Who do you go to when you need a problem solved?" If Bob is never mentioned as a problem solver or frequently mentioned as a bottleneck, the team is telling you what you need to know.

The Manager’s Mirror: Is It You?

This is the part most managers skip. Before labeling someone a low performer, look in the mirror.

• Did you set clear expectations? Does the employee know what success looks like?
• Do they have tools? Are they failing because they are fighting outdated software or bureaucracy?
• Is the role fit? Sometimes you have a great person in the wrong seat. A creative thinker will fail in a data entry role, and a detail-oriented analyst will fail in a chaotic sales role.

Taking Action

Once you have identified the low performer, waiting is the worst thing you can do. "Waiting for it to get better" is not a strategy; it is hope. And hope is not a management tool.

You owe it to the employee to have a clear, candid conversation. It does not have to be aggressive. It can be as simple as: "I’ve noticed a gap between what the role requires and the current output. Here are some specific examples. What is going on, and how do we bridge this gap?"

Final Thoughts

Recognizing low performance is tough because it clashes with our need to be liked and avoid conflict. But real leadership is not about being popular; it is about earning respect and guiding your team. Ignoring mediocre performances tells your top performers that their hard work doesn’t matter, which weakens the value of their effort. Spotting and addressing issues early help protect your team’s future, not just fix problems.

Keep your eyes open, trust your gut, but verify with data. Your team is watching, and they are waiting for you to lead.

Lead with clarity and confidence. Explore how StaffViz's workforce analytics can help you build stronger, more accountable teams.

FAQs

How can a manager identify a struggling team member?

Managers can look for behavior patterns, performance trends, reduced initiative, and feedback from teammates to spot someone who may be struggling.

Why is it important to spot low performers early?

Identifying issues early prevents burnout among top performers, protects project quality, and keeps the team’s workload balanced.

How do I know if a low performer needs support or a new role?

Before deciding on coaching or a role change, figure out if the problem is due to skills, workload, personal issues, or a poor fit for the role.

What data helps assess team performance?

Useful data includes task deadlines, how often work is revised, how much time is used, responsiveness, and feedback from clients or teammates.

How should managers address low performance?

Managers should have a direct and supportive conversation, set clear expectations, and track progress with specific checkpoints.

Effectively Manage Remote and Hybrid Teams with StaffViz

Enhance team efficiency and collaboration with StaffViz, the ultimate tool for managing remote and hybrid teams.

START FREE TRIAL

Tracy Taylor

I’m Tracey Taylor, a Content Strategist with over 4 years of experience in B2B and SaaS marketing. I’ve worked with companies like StreamlineREI and StaffViz to drive lead generation and business growth. Outside of work, I explore nature, read books, and play games to stay physically and mentally sharp.